WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Tom Udall (D-N.M.) joined U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and 16 Senate Democrats in urging the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to complete the rulemaking process to provide clear rules concerning disclaimers on online political advertisements. The letter follows a nearly ten-month period where the FEC lacked a quorum and was unable to undertake many of the agency’s key policymaking duties. Now, with the 2020 election just months away, it is vital that the FEC take action to ensure that voters know who is paying for advertisements online.
Prior to the FEC’s lack of a quorum, Udall joined a letter to the commissioners urging action on disclosure for online ads. The letter pointed out that during the 2018 midterm elections, federal, state and local campaigns spent approximately $2.3 billion online, compared to just $35 million in the 2014 cycle; when ads purchased by outside groups are included, the figure jumps to nearly $9 billion.
Last year, Udall led all 47 members of the Senate Democratic Caucus in introducing the For the People Act , a sweeping package of comprehensive reforms that would end special interest corruption of our politics and make government work for the people. The landmark legislation includes the Honest Ads Act , which would increase transparency and accountability for political ads on the internet by holding large online platforms to the same disclosure and disclaimer standards that apply to radio, broadcast, cable and satellite providers.
“Transparency is a key feature of a healthy democracy. As our democracy has modernized, our disclosure laws have not. The FEC last revised its rules governing internet disclaimers in 2006. With online advertising playing an increasingly important role in political elections, it is critical that the FEC issue clear up-to-date guidance on disclosure rules for online ads,” the senators wrote.
“We need clear and conspicuous disclaimers on all political advertisements within the Commission’s jurisdiction,” continued the senators. “These are necessary to ensure the level of transparency and accountability that a healthy democracy demands. Americans have the right to know who is paying for advertisements placed to influence their vote, regardless of whether those advertisements run on the radio, television, or online.”
Udall and Klobuchar are joined on the letter by Senators Dick Durbin (D-Il.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Thomas Carper (D-Del.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Angus King (I-Maine), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore).
The full text of the letter can be found HERE and below:
Dear Commissioners:
We write to express concern regarding the lack of transparency surrounding online political advertisements and to urge the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to move quickly to complete the rulemaking process that began on March 14, 2018. Having been without a quorum since August 31, 2019, the FEC has not been able to undertake many of the agency’s key policymaking duties. However, now that a quorum has been restored and with the 2020 election just months away, there is a dire need for clear rules concerning disclaimers on online political advertisements. These rules are necessary so that the American people can have confidence in their electoral system and know what entities are behind online advertisements intended to influence their vote.
Transparency is a key feature of a healthy democracy. As our democracy has modernized, our disclosure laws have not. The FEC last revised its rules governing internet disclaimers in 2006. With online advertising playing an increasingly important role in political elections, it is critical that the FEC issue clear up-to-date guidance on disclosure rules for online ads.
It is not enough that the FEC issue a rule – it must issue one that is strong. We need clear and conspicuous disclaimers on all political advertisements within the Commission’s jurisdiction. These are necessary to ensure the level of transparency and accountability that a healthy democracy demands. Americans have the right to know who is paying for advertisements placed to influence their vote, regardless of whether those advertisements run on the radio, television, or online.
Spending on political advertising, including online advertising, is growing rapidly. According to a 2019 study of archives created by Google, Facebook, and Twitter, ads with political content generated as many as 34 billion impressions. During the 2018 midterm elections, federal, state, and local campaigns spent approximately $2.3 billion on online advertising, compared to just $35 million in the 2014 cycle. When ads purchased by outside groups are included, the figure jumps to nearly $9 billion. Already, more than $1 billion has been spent on political advertisements for the 2020 election – the most money at any equivalent point in election history. Experts project that spending on political advertising will continue to grow, with more than $6 billion estimated to be spent this election cycle. As the amount of money flowing into online political advertising increases, so must our oversight of the spending.
The 2016 and 2018 elections exposed glaring holes in our ability to police foreign intervention, including interference through online political ads. America’s top intelligence officials have testified to the Senate Intelligence Committee that foreign adversaries are continuing to target our elections by sowing division online, and that the 2020 presidential election is a target. As recently as February of this year, intelligence officials warned that Russia was already interfering in the 2020 election.
The FEC’s mission is to “protect the integrity of the federal campaign finance process by providing transparency and fairly enforcing and administering federal campaign finance laws.” By failing to issue regulations that stay up to date with technological advancements, the FEC is failing in its core mission. For these reasons, we urge the FEC to complete the rulemaking process that began on March 14, 2018 and provide clarity to the disclaimer requirements for online political advertisements.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this serious matter.
Sincerely,